Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: April 26th, 2010, 11:47 pm
- Favorite Species: Maple
- Bonsai Age: 0
- Bonsai Club: CBS
- Location: Canberra
- Has thanked: 467 times
- Been thanked: 228 times
Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
So I went for a wander through the Australian National Botanic Gardens here in Canberra, to prepare for a walk I had to lead, to discuss the relationship between "wild" trees and bonsai, in connection with the recent Australian Plants as Bonsai show here in late February.
Some photos and thoughts. Probably nothing I haven't said before, but the colours and shapes once again made me think. Never a good sign.
Complex dense shapes, with lots of angles and depths. Not parallel layers. Damn near never parallel layers.
Different species together. Bush, even.
Leaves are often sparse, with intricate branch networks in space.
Ground cover = dead leaves and litter. Not moss/grass/greenery.
Complicated (did I say?):
Interesting angles (did I say?):
More to follow
Gavin
Some photos and thoughts. Probably nothing I haven't said before, but the colours and shapes once again made me think. Never a good sign.
Complex dense shapes, with lots of angles and depths. Not parallel layers. Damn near never parallel layers.
Different species together. Bush, even.
Leaves are often sparse, with intricate branch networks in space.
Ground cover = dead leaves and litter. Not moss/grass/greenery.
Complicated (did I say?):
Interesting angles (did I say?):
More to follow
Gavin
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: April 26th, 2010, 11:47 pm
- Favorite Species: Maple
- Bonsai Age: 0
- Bonsai Club: CBS
- Location: Canberra
- Has thanked: 467 times
- Been thanked: 228 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
More.
Calligraphic shapes. Strong design.
Interesting angles (did I say?)
(I did like Squizzy's Claret Tops today...)
Native flowers don't need cover the bush to be dramatic. Callistemon brachyandrum, from memory. Sparks of gold and scarlet.
Five different shades of Casuarina-family leaves.
Sumo trunk. Natural. There you go. I still don't like grossly disproportionate trunks in bonsai, but stumpies are definitely out there. Acas. torulosa from memory.
Just some thoughts. If I want my bonsai to look like a tree, I have a loooong way to go.
Gavin
Calligraphic shapes. Strong design.
Interesting angles (did I say?)
(I did like Squizzy's Claret Tops today...)
Native flowers don't need cover the bush to be dramatic. Callistemon brachyandrum, from memory. Sparks of gold and scarlet.
Five different shades of Casuarina-family leaves.
Sumo trunk. Natural. There you go. I still don't like grossly disproportionate trunks in bonsai, but stumpies are definitely out there. Acas. torulosa from memory.
Just some thoughts. If I want my bonsai to look like a tree, I have a loooong way to go.
Gavin
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Rory
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: January 23rd, 2013, 11:19 pm
- Favorite Species: Baeckea Phebalium Casuarina & Banksia
- Bonsai Age: 24
- Location: Central Coast, NSW
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Great photos Gav. I too prefer the dead leaf look on the top the medium, especially with casuarina. And Ross from the central coast club exhibition did just that on one of his a few years back, looked great.
Kcpoole (Ken), posted a very interesting point in one of the natural threads a few years back which had strong merit.
He said that a consideration must be given to whether you are styling the natural tree as in its forest element, or if it was growing stand-alone.
Because boy.... there can be a massive difference in growth between identical species from this perspective.
Kcpoole (Ken), posted a very interesting point in one of the natural threads a few years back which had strong merit.
He said that a consideration must be given to whether you are styling the natural tree as in its forest element, or if it was growing stand-alone.
Because boy.... there can be a massive difference in growth between identical species from this perspective.
Rory
I style Bonsai naturally, just as they would appear in the wild.
Central Coast, NSW
Bonsai: Casuarina Leptospermum Banksia Phebalium Baeckea Melalueca Ficus
Growing Australian natives as Bonsai: viewtopic.php?p=289480#p289480
Buying and repotting Native nursery material: viewtopic.php?f=78&t=30724
Growing tips for Casuarina as Bonsai: viewtopic.php?p=244995#p244995
How to reduce moss from the trunk without damaging the bark: viewtopic.php?p=295227#p295227
I style Bonsai naturally, just as they would appear in the wild.
Central Coast, NSW
Bonsai: Casuarina Leptospermum Banksia Phebalium Baeckea Melalueca Ficus
Growing Australian natives as Bonsai: viewtopic.php?p=289480#p289480
Buying and repotting Native nursery material: viewtopic.php?f=78&t=30724
Growing tips for Casuarina as Bonsai: viewtopic.php?p=244995#p244995
How to reduce moss from the trunk without damaging the bark: viewtopic.php?p=295227#p295227
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 694
- Joined: November 4th, 2013, 6:47 pm
- Favorite Species: Pines, Junipers
- Bonsai Age: 0
- Location: Wollongong
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
I think we are in danger in this community of expecting bonsai to be a photographic replica of a natural tree. The push toward natural styling has many merits, but it completely discounts the artists desire, or the value of, a portrayal of theme.
One does not have to style a tree as an exact scale replica of a natural tree in order to convey a sense of nature, and I stand by my beliefs that if a tree was designed in this manner it would look terrible in a pot.
Some of what bonsai is, is purely aesthetic, it is art. Nobody is crucifying artists for not being realistic enough, and yet we in this country are tending toward that way of thinking when it comes to bonsai.
On top of this I believe that to bring aesthetics into the regard of the natural tree would be to miss the point entirely, it is not only the way the natural tree looks, it is the setting, it is the scale, it is the undeniable weight and presence of nature itself. Can we ever manage to replicate these in miniature?
Let’s just do bonsai for the reasons we each want to do bonsai, and do it however, and to the best our abilities, we can
One does not have to style a tree as an exact scale replica of a natural tree in order to convey a sense of nature, and I stand by my beliefs that if a tree was designed in this manner it would look terrible in a pot.
Some of what bonsai is, is purely aesthetic, it is art. Nobody is crucifying artists for not being realistic enough, and yet we in this country are tending toward that way of thinking when it comes to bonsai.
On top of this I believe that to bring aesthetics into the regard of the natural tree would be to miss the point entirely, it is not only the way the natural tree looks, it is the setting, it is the scale, it is the undeniable weight and presence of nature itself. Can we ever manage to replicate these in miniature?
Let’s just do bonsai for the reasons we each want to do bonsai, and do it however, and to the best our abilities, we can
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 7669
- Joined: August 22nd, 2009, 8:41 pm
- Favorite Species: trident maple
- Bonsai Age: 41
- Bonsai Club: Albury/Wodonga; BSV; Canberra; VNBC
- Location: Yackandandah
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 1415 times
- Contact:
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
There's always a difference between close and far view. close up we can see all the detail but from further away the detail disappears and we see outline - form and flow.
I suppose you can make bonsai from a close up view but there is little room for detail in a miniature tree. We can get a certain amount of ramification and fine twigs into a small space but far easier to show a more distant view
Try taking the camera back and looking for some more distant shots of trees, Gavin and see what sort of different perspective that gives our natives. I'm sure some of those interesting angles that attract our attention will still be there.
I also agree with most of Kez post. Most art tries to convey the feel of something rather than the detail. We don't need to show every twig and leaf to convey the feeling of lots of leaves and twigs - not if it is done well. Often some aspects are overemphasised to gain attention. I think that's where the 'sumo' trunk diameter comes from - not because it is realistic, rather because we want to push the idea that the trunks of older trees are quite thick. I've also heard talk of 'forced perspective' as a concept in art which I take to mean similar. Something not quite realistic in proportions but it makes our minds think it is????
Great to see Gav and others looking at trees like this to bring us back to what trees really look like rather than what we think they look like.
I suppose you can make bonsai from a close up view but there is little room for detail in a miniature tree. We can get a certain amount of ramification and fine twigs into a small space but far easier to show a more distant view
Try taking the camera back and looking for some more distant shots of trees, Gavin and see what sort of different perspective that gives our natives. I'm sure some of those interesting angles that attract our attention will still be there.
I also agree with most of Kez post. Most art tries to convey the feel of something rather than the detail. We don't need to show every twig and leaf to convey the feeling of lots of leaves and twigs - not if it is done well. Often some aspects are overemphasised to gain attention. I think that's where the 'sumo' trunk diameter comes from - not because it is realistic, rather because we want to push the idea that the trunks of older trees are quite thick. I've also heard talk of 'forced perspective' as a concept in art which I take to mean similar. Something not quite realistic in proportions but it makes our minds think it is????
Great to see Gav and others looking at trees like this to bring us back to what trees really look like rather than what we think they look like.
http://shibuibonsai.com.au/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Keep Calm and Ramify
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 953
- Joined: April 1st, 2017, 11:50 am
- Bonsai Age: 0
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Has thanked: 402 times
- Been thanked: 451 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
A far view - solitary - with it's massive apex residing on the ground.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Raging Bull
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 835
- Joined: January 3rd, 2017, 9:29 am
- Favorite Species: Pines
- Bonsai Age: 5
- Bonsai Club: Gold Coast-Tweed
- Location: Gold Coast Qld
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 197 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Thank you, thank you KCaR ... you have given me inspiration with your photo on how to style a yamadori eucalypt I have been agonizing over since it's started budding out after being dug.
Cheers, Frank.
Cheers, Frank.
- Keep Calm and Ramify
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 953
- Joined: April 1st, 2017, 11:50 am
- Bonsai Age: 0
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Has thanked: 402 times
- Been thanked: 451 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Look forward to seeing that Frank - just don't get too attached to you're apex!
- wrcmad
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 547
- Joined: April 25th, 2014, 10:57 pm
- Favorite Species: Maple, Pine, Fig
- Bonsai Age: 34
- Location: Northern NSW
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Wow!kez wrote:I think we are in danger in this community of expecting bonsai to be a photographic replica of a natural tree. The push toward natural styling has many merits, but it completely discounts the artists desire, or the value of, a portrayal of theme.
One does not have to style a tree as an exact scale replica of a natural tree in order to convey a sense of nature, and I stand by my beliefs that if a tree was designed in this manner it would look terrible in a pot.
Some of what bonsai is, is purely aesthetic, it is art. Nobody is crucifying artists for not being realistic enough, and yet we in this country are tending toward that way of thinking when it comes to bonsai.
On top of this I believe that to bring aesthetics into the regard of the natural tree would be to miss the point entirely, it is not only the way the natural tree looks, it is the setting, it is the scale, it is the undeniable weight and presence of nature itself. Can we ever manage to replicate these in miniature?
Let’s just do bonsai for the reasons we each want to do bonsai, and do it however, and to the best our abilities, we can
I don't think I've seen a more diplomatic and succinct response to this topic.
Well done Kez.
Not only do I agree with you 100%, but you saved me from submitting a much less gracious reaction.
Having encountered this point of contention one too many times on this forum, I am sincerely starting to believe that the "natural look" is merely a justification used to bypass the time-consuming methods needed to produce a quality traditional specimen.(?)
Anyway, here are a few suggestions on some of the more detailed points raised:
Complex dense shapes result in die-back of the inner foliage/ramification due to shading out - it is a horticultural factor.GavinG wrote:Complex dense shapes, with lots of angles and depths. Not parallel layers. Damn near never parallel layers......
Leaves are often sparse, with intricate branch networks in space.
Layering of foliage increases exposure to sunlight, increasing the health of the tree and enhancing the sustainability of this type of horticulture.
Sparse foliage (lack of foliage mass) is a literati - a style too often used on nursery stock when there is nowhere else to go to attain a tree in the short-term.
Three pronged:GavinG wrote:Ground cover = dead leaves and litter. Not moss/grass/greenery.
Firstly, moss is used in the artistry to visually enhance the trunk and nebari, while at the same time visually separating them from the rim of the pot.
Second, it is a horticultural factor, as a moss layer raises the saturation zone of the very porous soil in a bonsai pot.
Third, a dead-leaf ground cover in a bonsai pot would look a bit neglected, crappy and lazy.
Last edited by wrcmad on March 21st, 2019, 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Keep Calm and Ramify
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 953
- Joined: April 1st, 2017, 11:50 am
- Bonsai Age: 0
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Has thanked: 402 times
- Been thanked: 451 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Wait...what?..there's time consuming methods being bypassed? Why am I always the last person to know these things! ARRGHHH...wrcmad wrote: the "natural look" is merely a justification used to bypass the time-consuming methods needed to produce a quality traditional specimen.(?)
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 295
- Joined: May 19th, 2016, 12:11 am
- Favorite Species: figs & junipers
- Bonsai Age: 4
- Location: sydney
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Thankyou Gavin
Lots of valid points have been made
Wrcmad; quote.
I am sincerely starting to believe that the "natural look" is merely a justification used to bypass the time-consuming methods needed to produce a quality traditional specimen.(?)
Well said
Lots of valid points have been made
Wrcmad; quote.
I am sincerely starting to believe that the "natural look" is merely a justification used to bypass the time-consuming methods needed to produce a quality traditional specimen.(?)
Well said
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: November 11th, 2009, 9:03 pm
- Favorite Species: Almond
- Bonsai Age: 2
- Location: South Coast NSW
- Has thanked: 274 times
- Been thanked: 395 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
A little unsure about the" Natural Look" being just a quick fix . A good tree can be just as time consuming and complex as a Traditional styled tree in my opinion.. John.
- Grant Bowie
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 3809
- Joined: February 18th, 2009, 3:22 pm
- Favorite Species: Banksia
- Bonsai Age: 52
- Bonsai Club: Canberra
- Location: Canberra
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
And don’t forget “masterfull inactivity”, knowing when to leave well enough alone. A natural bonsai can emerge over time but it may end up taking just as much lineal time to produce as a”traditional specimen” but of course with less effort but with more will power (or really its Won’t Power or Don’t Power or don’t even think about it power”)Keep Calm and Ramify wrote:Wait...what?..there's time consuming methods being bypassed? Why am I always the last person to know these things! ARRGHHH...wrcmad wrote: the "natural look" is merely a justification used to bypass the time-consuming methods needed to produce a quality traditional specimen.(?)
Thanks for the topic Gavin.
Grant
-
- Aussie Bonsai Fan
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: February 4th, 2009, 10:03 pm
- Favorite Species: Acacia howittii
- Bonsai Age: 25
- Bonsai Club: CBS, WCBG
- Location: Canberra
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Things we don't much do in bonsai. Why?
Gavin was not talking about "natural trees", but about various features observed in native trees, inferring that these could be inspiring in bonsai. He wonders why there is little evidence we bonsai growers have used them as such.I think we are in danger in this community of expecting bonsai to be a photographic replica of a natural tree. The push toward natural styling has many merits, but it completely discounts the artists desire, or the value of, a portrayal of theme.
About "natural styling" or the "natural look": let's avoid fixing attributes by trying to define and describe them. It just leads to a limitation of the bonsai concept, as the "traditional" or "classical style" have done.
Let's go instead for Grant's "natural bonsai".
Huh.... What is that?
You'll know it when you see it.
Lisa