But why should such a small elite demographic be able to take what others can't?
Did I say that? My point is that a tiny handful of collected material of common species from millions of square miles makes no difference. A small (natural) bushfire would wipe out 100 years of such collecting in a few hours. Same with land clearing, back burning, flooding etc etc.
quote] Public land is different and unless it is going to be cleared anyway it shouldn't be taken as this is unlawful in most places.[/quote]
No one is arguing that it is illegal. The fact remains that the collection of a few hundred trees will make no difference whatsoever to the Australian ecology.
You would find it hard to find yamadori in Japan now.There's a message to be learn't there.
A different situation. Japan has probably 100 times the bonsai growers that we will ever have. Most of the collected material was shimpaku which was in very limited numbers on a few mountains.
Not quite the same as 1000 miles of coast with hundreds of millions of coastal tea trees or vast plains of melaleucas for example.
As another example, when I visited Port Campbell a few years back, I saw mile after mile of Leucopogon parviflorus. These plants where about 1 metre high. All where beautiful windswept masterpeices. If everyone who grew bonsai in australia took 10 each of these, no one would notice them missing. (not even the birds) There where literally millions of them.
Granted almost impossible to remove successfully