bodhidharma wrote:I have a question on this. As we are pushing, or coming up with new ways to push a tree into growing faster than it normally should, will it cut into the longevity of a tree. I.E Will the tree reach its lifespan quicker? Marijuana is grown very quickly,cut down, and used. Is not our aim to produce trees that will become generational and outlive us? It seems to me that we want to produce trees that reach potential quickly and maybe end up with McBonsai's. The best trees in the world are still the old trees of Japan and they certainly have outlived generations and are glorious. I to experiment with soils but have arrived at the conclusion to keep it as natural as possible and be patient. As we do not know the end result of cutting into a trees lifespan by pushing it hard maybe best to stick to tried and true methods. I, for one, think my world and lifespan comes and goes quick enough and enjoy watching my trees grow at their own pace. Besides all that, i cannot keep up with their grooming as it is

Interesting thought.
Lebanese cedars live for around 1,000 years in their natural habitat but in England they only live around 400 yrs. They grow quicker and keel over earlier.Will they live 1,000 years as Bonsai? I'll let you know in 980 years time.
Will an Acacia live longer than its normal time span as a bonsai? Probably yes is my thought. We can watch carefully and protect against disease and insect attack that usually cause them to keel over at a young age.
I don't think we will shorten the lifespan of a bonsai by keeping it well fed, watered, pest and disease free(ish). As I have always been an advocate for higher than "conventional fertilizing regimes" and have never subscribed to the "half strength" fertilizing myth I am obviously biased but my trees and those at the collection are "healthy".
The other well known advocate of Super Feeding (His name escapes me ; American Italian name) told me that once you get the tree to the state you wan't it to be at for long periods you back off the fertilizer, as
Walter also says, but not too long to the detriment of the tree.
Grant