Re: Japanese maple question
Posted: February 14th, 2014, 7:35 pm
Interesting Post,
I wish I had a clear answer for you, however if I were to guess would imagine it has to be related to the root system on the two tree, clearly the tree which has bounced back has had sufficient energy stored in the roots to push hard new foliage to pop, where as the tree that has not bounced back so well has lacked the stored energy and therefore recovery has not been as dramatic.
Now the question becomes is the difference in root mass itself? if so what is the difference and what caused the difference? soil conditions? or was the stored energy in the roots a reflection of the treatment of the tree prior to the defoliating.
I think this presents an ideal opportunity here to do some serious investigations on the circumstances around both tree and learn from this. I would imagine the it would be desirable for both trees to perform like the tree on the right, I would think that a tree that reacted like this would develop a lot quicker than the other.
cheers,
Jeff
I wish I had a clear answer for you, however if I were to guess would imagine it has to be related to the root system on the two tree, clearly the tree which has bounced back has had sufficient energy stored in the roots to push hard new foliage to pop, where as the tree that has not bounced back so well has lacked the stored energy and therefore recovery has not been as dramatic.
Now the question becomes is the difference in root mass itself? if so what is the difference and what caused the difference? soil conditions? or was the stored energy in the roots a reflection of the treatment of the tree prior to the defoliating.
I think this presents an ideal opportunity here to do some serious investigations on the circumstances around both tree and learn from this. I would imagine the it would be desirable for both trees to perform like the tree on the right, I would think that a tree that reacted like this would develop a lot quicker than the other.
cheers,
Jeff