Page 1 of 2
Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 10:43 am
by Bonbon
Being humble is a merit of character. May take a long time to learn but worth trying.
Try look at the flower blooming at this time of the year. Who can stay "not humbled" by the beauty and wonder of nature?
(Sorry about the wire, though. Not time yet to remove)
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 11:32 am
by Jester
Wow , beautiful photography Bonbon
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 11:53 am
by miyagiman
very, very, nice. i can appreciate this. can we see the whole tree?. dave.
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 12:02 pm
by Bain
miyagiman wrote:very, very, nice. i can appreciate this. can we see the whole tree?. dave.
Indeed - and its full name.
I keep getting sidetracked on the way to work each day with all the early Cherry tree blossomings happening..
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 12:10 pm
by NathanM
Beautiful ^_^
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 12:25 pm
by Jester
The name of the tree that the larger flower belongs to is "Prunus Blireana" - Purple Leafed Plum and the smaller flowers belong to a tree called "Prunus Cerasifera - var. Atropurpurea" Purple Cherry Plum
Hey Bonbon, do you mind me asking what kind of camera you used for those brilliant shots? Was it automatic or SLR? How many mexapixels?
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 3:24 pm
by astroboy76
hey Jester,
I have taken pics similar to this with great quality also. I have an olympus digital camera. it isnt an SLR. i just use the macro feature. Is superb for close up shots
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 6:37 pm
by Bonbon
I think Jester is correct about the names. I always misplaced their name tag while potting and then forget their names. The "Prunus X Blireana" is a hybrid between Prunus Mume and Cerasifera. I got all my prunus from RayNesci and they are not expensive at all.
For the camera, It's a very old Minolta D7i, one of the first generation semi-pro camera. Not a DSLR. I like it very much, Robust and reliable. Serve me well for the past 10 years. I keep it handy near my bonsai working area and take lots of picture. I love to capture the beauty of my trees and record how they evolve over the years.
One misconception about DSLR is DSLR normally takes better pictures. It is not necessarily true. DSLR is more flexible in focal length because you can change lenses and the viewfinder is more truthful to the final image. I find that most adv. amateur DC can do a very decent job.
Macro helps to focus close. Use large aperture, long focal length will help to blur the background and make the subject stands out more thus reduce distraction. Steady hands and sharp focusing is important too.
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 14th, 2009, 8:41 pm
by Webos
Couldnt agree with you more...I'm a photographer by profession, and I truly think that the photo quality of point and shoot cameras nowadays is excellent. If you dont need an SLR...There aint really a need to get one. Go buy yourself a nice little Canon Ixus or something like that. Dont even bother yourself with how many megapixels it might have, its all a gimick. You dont really need more than about 3 megapixels to take good shots...6 if you are going to blow it up to poster size. The most important thing of all is the quality of the glass in the lens...good glass, crisp clear shots, crap glass, soft shots...
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 15th, 2009, 2:58 pm
by Joel
And a properly exposed film shot is ALWAYS nicer than a digital shot. . . . .
JayC
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 15th, 2009, 5:01 pm
by Webos
I dunno if I can agree with you there JayC.....With cameras these days, there aint much of a difference between Digital and Film. I'd agree that people do have some sort of romantic attachment to film..But side by side, I dont think many people would be able to tell the difference.
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 15th, 2009, 8:59 pm
by Joel
Hi Webos
I was always under the influence that the natural colour saturation (without alteration) was better (more realistic) with film. Perhaps it was just my photography teachers romantic obsession in that case. She was a bit odd. . . . .
JayC
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 15th, 2009, 10:41 pm
by kcpoole
JayC wrote:Hi Webos
She was a bit odd. . . . .
JayC
Aren't they all.
Unless you were to be looking at a print direct from negative, a digital image side by side then you will have false artefacts degrading each one.
If you were to scan the Neg, then you will have the scanners limitations to deal with, and if you were to print the Dig image, you will have printer artefacts and issues as well.
The 2 mediums are different and cannot be directly compared as the processes involved are to dissimilar.
Ken
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 15th, 2009, 11:02 pm
by Webos
Oh no JC....what have we started! Back to the prunus! Nice flowers aint they?!!
Re: Prunus too!
Posted: August 16th, 2009, 2:31 am
by Si Van Nguyen
That's beautiful! The flowers and the photography. Thanks for sharing.
I would love to have one of these bonsai.
Si