bodhidharma wrote:Pup wrote: Is it possible to get a closer look at the foliage, please.
Yes, of course Pup. Again pre planning let me down and i went off to a dig with no camera

It is a bit windy here at the moment but i hope this is enough to i.d. it.

I am inclined towards M, ericifolia as it fits the description and the pictures, and is native to your area.
It has also been said to be a close resemblance to M armillaris, but it is different in the colour of the paperbark and smller more prolific flowers.
It is also described as a variable plant which is why it is sometimes refered to as M, armillaris, and has self hybridised with other close relatives?!.
I hope this does not leave you too dissapointed or confused, as it has me from reading the descriptions.
Cheers

Pup