

That is one crazzzzy Trunk!
Regards Mick
banksiaman wrote:How cool is that,
now if only I had a big enough pot and a few friends for a yamadori![]()
![]()
Andrew Legg wrote:Don't know what you lot are getting all excited about. It is a rubbish tree because it has reverse taper. That makes it rubbish because the rules say so. It looks terrible, and I think it is a waste of yamadori time and effort.
My sentiments exactly Luke308Luke308 wrote:Andrew Legg wrote:Don't know what you lot are getting all excited about. It is a rubbish tree because it has reverse taper. That makes it rubbish because the rules say so. It looks terrible, and I think it is a waste of yamadori time and effort.
There are no rules Andrew, bonsai is an art form, therefore they are guidelines. Yes you need to understand them before you know how to bend or break them. But I think the point of the post was to share the fact that it is an ancient tree, that even after all these years is still producing olives.
I think I would ignore the reverse taper if I had a tree that old in my collection, just like David Joyce has a tree with the main branch coming from the inside of a curve. If we all stuck to the "rules" as you put it, we would all have trees that were almost identical. Art mimicking nature is how I think it should be approached, and if nature produces reverse taper, then so be it![]()
chipper5 wrote: Just think, if only trees could talk! (I'd stay and chat awhile)
Chipper5