That has since changed.
I decided to keep both as they are not bad.
This has been a project of a few years and they have been shown at exhibitions.
So here are some pics of them Nekid

this one? Just sorta kind looks to straight from the base up to the top of this sectionPup wrote:My eyes must be bent as I do not see a straight section.![]()
Cheers
Ken mate, that is the bottom and it does look straight but it is not. The tree is slightly off in the pic, although I will now have to have another look.kcpoole wrote:this one? Just sorta kind looks to straight from the base up to the top of this sectionPup wrote:My eyes must be bent as I do not see a straight section.![]()
Cheers![]()
Thoughts?
Ken
Figured that you would not have a tree that was dodgy like that, and there must be something else going on that cannot be seen in the flesh.Pup wrote: Ken mate, that is the bottom and it does look straight but it is not. The tree is slightly off in the pic, although I will now have to have another look.
It is not straight when clothed, so it must be a queen![]()
Hello again Ken, the tree does not have a trunk as such. If you look at the top view you will notice a hollow as the trunk splits into 5 branches, so the one in quetion is a branch more than the trunk. I will still look though.kcpoole wrote:Figured that you would not have a tree that was dodgy like that, and there must be something else going on that cannot be seen in the flesh.Pup wrote: Ken mate, that is the bottom and it does look straight but it is not. The tree is slightly off in the pic, although I will now have to have another look.
It is not straight when clothed, so it must be a queen![]()
@hartosI agree, but when you have a change in trunk taper like that, i would expect some movement as well rather than a continuing line across the Sections as it appears.
Ken