Hi dansaidansai wrote:Ok. So I did a bit of reading in my Botany For Gardeners (Brian Capon) which was my introduction to plant hormones. I had in my head that auxin will accumulate in the top side of the branch. However it is in the lower part of a young stem that it accumulates causing the cells in the underside to elongate more and thereby the stem grows more upright. The same happens on the shady side of a stem causing the stem to grow towards the light. This is obviously more effective in a elongating stem as opposed to an established branch/trunk.
From further reading on the web the role of auxins on apical dominance seems to be relatively little understood but generally agreed that it is produced by the growing meristem (tip) and that will suppress lateral buds below it. Further away from the tip, lower concentrations allows lateral buds to develop and branching occurs. Different species produce different amounts of auxins and react differently to their presence and so some species are strongly apical dominant (pines are a good example), others not so and yet others exhibit very little (shrubs).
If i hadn't just spent good money on this pine I may have done some experimenting by wiring half the branches down and the others not to see if there is a difference. As it is I might remove a little more of the top, wire what I want to keep with a bit more to spare and repot in spring doing the half/half method recommended by Scott.
I happened to visit a friend tonight and picked up his year 12 biology textbook and read the similar explanation about the presence of auxin on the underside of a branch that aids the elongation of the new growth. I suppose it explained why my Chinese elms would stretch couple of inches in new growth in the low light environment of the shopping centres within 24 hours
In any case, this discussion is to highlight the benefit of removing strong growth to promote advantageous back budding. So I only hope that it gives people more confidence in hard pruning.

Regards