Roses

[GavinG]

There's been a bit of discussion about roses as bonsai - here are two. I've been assured that they're "not bonsai" but going on what Kobayashi and Murata have shown in their books, I think that the Japanese may be a bit less rule-defined than we are. There are certainly problems with traditional forms using roses.

This one is "Crepuscule" , a Noisette climber. It originally grew over the back of my first house.

P1080465.jpg

There are certainly some fine textures and shapes to be had in a good old stump.

P1080467.jpg

But the flowers develop at the end of a (longish) burst of growth, so form is always going to be a bit dodgy.

P1080468.jpg

The next one I think is a root-stock gone feral.

P1080469.jpg

Intensely coloured flowers,

P1080471.jpg

and another good base,

P1080472.jpg

but once again, no structure between the two, and a long run before the flowers develop.

P1080473.jpg

It depends what you want - if you have to have a formal rigid structure, done by the rules, then roses aren't for you. They can have some great features that make growing them worth the effort. They need a long time in the ground, with lots of hard cutting back, before they'll make a good stump.

Gavin

[matty-j]

hey gavin

mate i love them!!
they don't conform to the "rules of bonsai" but i think they look great

cheers
matt