

I personally think most starter trees look a bit contrived, especially after the first branch placement. Lets give it another ten years.Boics wrote:Why though do I get such a resounding "contrived" feeling when I view this specimen?
I daresay this feeling would be lost with more substance (branches and leaves).
That was the first thing I thought when I looked at it. The 3rd branch seemed to stick out of place to me. I like where your headed with though Bodhitime8theuniverse wrote:I'm not sure about the 3rd trunk from the left. I think it would be better without it in the composure so you get a negative space in the trunks and avoid the fan like array. It makes the other trunks seem straighter.
My thinking exactly Moganic and it will remain with the seven trunks. 2d photos make it hard to understand the setting and looks a whole lot different in the flesh. I will make further decisions down the track once the branches have developed more.MoGanic wrote:Removing a single trunk would leave an even number of trunks in the composition and IMO this detracts from the overall aesthetic.
Once thing I would note is that the third trunk from the left has branches moving towards the back of the tree despite the trunk placement being more towards the front of the tree. The second from the left follows the same pattern in reverse. The combination of the two makes that section look a little odd in photos. I think that when viewing the tree in person, this would be less obvious.
time8theuniverse wrote:Did you get a photo of the inspiring colour?
It has been my experience and learning to not be hasty in decisions of importance. The tree will be developed with seven trunks and ramification will play a huge part. If, after ten or so years of ramifying and if i think it has no place in the composition then i will consider other options. It is easier to cut later rather than to grow later after realizing your mistake. Another consideration is a five trunk group if the composition is to crowded after branch building.time8theuniverse wrote: Is there agreement that the 3rd trunk from the left is one of the problems? If it is the agreement what are the option other than removal.
VERY wise words mr bodhi!bodhidharma wrote: It has been my experience and learning to not be hasty in decisions of importance. The tree will be developed with seven trunks and ramification will play a huge part. If, after ten or so years of ramifying and if i think it has no place in the composition then i will consider other options. It is easier to cut later rather than to grow later after realizing your mistake. Another consideration is a five trunk group if the composition is to crowded after branch building.