Jamie wrote:hi guys
its interesting as jezz just linked me to a couple of styph. he has and one didnt look like it and another did, then looking at the one strawbs put up the leaves look some what smaller to strawbs tree. and tighter internodes, this could be somewhat of a variation to it as we know how different and hard melalueca can be to ID especially on young or old trees alike. I think I am going to have to get some more pics of this one!
I have been going through google myself with not a 100% perfect match.
not that I am phased to much about a perfect ID as I am pretty sure I wont have to much of a problem keeping them alive if and when they strike
S.O.P, if you think it could be a variety of Acacia I am more than happy for you to try and find them

dont stress a great deal about it though as I am sure it will pop into your head sometime
thanks guys

All it takes is one question to our Nursery Manager. He will remember the ID. I could even, when at work, drive to the place I collected the sample and take a photo for you if ID is an issue. It won't come into my head, I struggle with botanical names and my job revolves around them. I'm like Homer Simpson on wine, one thing enters my brain, one leaves (see the pun?).
For example, the pic above me, to me, looks nothing like your sample. And it's based on internode length, though your pictures aren't the best. The way you talk about fast-growing, tight internodes, remind me of this recent ID we did. I couldn't describe the colour from memory but is it the classic blue-green? When I came across this sample, however long ago - 2 months at the most, it was flowering the usual acacia flower but maybe, you being in a different area, it had already come and gone.